![]() |
Scalar Potentials and Scalar WavesDue to the large amont of misinformation regarding the subject of scalar waves, we have included this section to help make people aware of the differences between accepted scalar scientific ideas and the pseudoscientific theories. In the previous sections we discussed the difference between scalar and vector quantities, and how this relates to electromagnetic waves. This section deals with the topic of 'Scalar Waves' and 'Scalar Field Theory' in an attempt to remove some of the mystery and confusion around these subjects. If you enter the search term "Scalar Waves" in to a popular search engine such as Google, you will find many pages discussing the topic of 'Scalar Electromagnetic Waves'. This is very misleading as such waves are totally unproven in the accepted scientific community. In mathematics and physics, a scalar field associates a scalar to every point in space. Scalar fields are often used in physics, for instance to indicate the temperature distribution throughout space, or the air pressure. Some waves, such as temperature waves or pressure waves can be considered as scalar waves. This is because Temperature and pressure are scalar quantities and have no direction associated with them. Any electromagnetic phenomenon, however will always have a directional (vector) component associated with it. This is because a magnetic field is always a dipole (north and south), and is actually caused by the motion of charged particles or an electric current. The rest of this page contains information from a Wikipedia article about scalar electromagnetic waves. The theory is considered pseudoscience (nonsense) yet is widley promoted among reseachers looking for 'free energy' or 'over unity'. The article below contains many obvious flaws and blatant mathematical errors. To skip the rest of this section click a link below. You can also add your comments and suggestions ad the bottom of the page. Next Page: Light
in Materials
Scalar wave theory is a controversial theory and is considered pseudo science by most qualified scientists. The articles from Wikipedia, below are aimed to help you understand the concept of scalar electromagnetic waves, but you should remain vigilant when reading about related topics as there are many people working hard to promote nonsense for profit. We are not trying to prove nor disprove scalar theory. We just wish to provide you with an independent unbiased source of information. If you can help improve this section then please contact us v
Info from Wikipedia v Scalar waves are hypothetical waves, which differ from the conventional electromagnetic transverse waves by one oscillation level parallel to the direction of propagation, they thus have characteristics of longitudinal waves. Their existence however, as presupposed in numerous parascientific and pseudoscientific theories, has so far not been proven. Scalar waves are called also "electromagnetic longitudinal waves" or "Teslawellen". Description Magnetic fields interaction When the field lines oppose each other, the magnets are pulled together. When the fields are aligned in the same direction, the magnets push apart. When two magnets strongly oppose each other but are not permitted to move apart, the force between them is said to create a "scalar bubble" between the magnets. The greater the repulsive force, the larger this scalar bubble becomes. As the magnets move away and the pushing force decreases, the scalar bubble shrinks in size and strength. In a similar manner, two magnets that are strongly attracted create a "scalar void" between them that grows larger the closer the two magnets become. Two magnets powerfully attracted to one another create a very large scalar void, that decreases as the attracting magnets are moved apart. Despite the claims of its proponents, no repeatable experiments were able to show the existence of the scalar field. All observed effects were shown to comply to the standard physical laws of electrodynamics. As not only classical electromagnetics but also quantum electrodynamics are a field of physics, where the observations are in spectacular agreement with the theoretical predictions, currently the case for Scalar field theory looks bleak.
Field effects of scalar energy This means that a pair of magnets that are rthymicly opposing/attracting each other are sending out scalar ripples through space that will slightly perturb the scalar bubble/void between a second pair magnets nearby. The net effect is that the attraction and/or repulsion between the second pair of magnets exhibits a change in strength, even though the magnets and fields themselves are motionless. According to skeptics, the following description given for an application to a communication system reportedly failed to give reproduceable results. A basic scalar communications system A scalar signal reception antenna similarly excludes normal electromagnetic waves and only measures changes in magnetic field attraction and repulsion. This will typically be a two-coil powered antenna that sets up a static opposing or attracting magnetic field between the coils, and the coils are counter-wound so that any normal RF signal will be picked up by both coils and effectively cancel itself out. Other claims, theories, and suggestions It has been suggested that scalar fields do not follow the same rules as electromagnetic waves, and can penetrate through materials that would normally slow or absorb electromagnetic waves. If true, a simple proving method is to design a scalar signal emitter and a scalar signal receiver, and encasing each inside separate shielded and grounded metal boxes, known as faraday cages. These boxes will absorb all normal electromagnetic energy, and will prevent any regular non-scalar signal transmissions from passing from one box to the other. Some people have suggested that organic life may make use of scalar
energies in ways that we do not yet understand. Therefore caution is
recommended when experimenting with this fringe technology. However,
keep in mind that if scalar fields do exist, we are likely already deeply
immersed in an unseen field of scalar noise all the time, generated
anywhere two magnetic fields oppose or attract. Common scalar field
noise sources include AC electric cords and powerlines carrying high
current, and electric motors which operate on the principle of powerful
spinning regions of repulsion and attraction. Next Page: Light
in Materials |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nicolle | Thursday, 14th December 2006 12:33am - No.599 |
| what is wave theory!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |
| DrHolland | Monday, 5th March 2007 9:06pm - No.846 |
| Clearly you are not aware of the ground breaking work of Podkletnov with scalar gravity waves. Google 'Podkletnov' and you may find some of his work. There is an audio interview with him on the net (Americanantigravity.com). Using spinning superconducting disks and high voltage spark generators (Marx Generator), he is able to generate powerful scalar waves, he calls gravity waves, which have punched holes in the sides of building 3 miles away! The power of the wave does NOT diminsh with distance from the source.... thus, it is a true scalar wave! Catch up on what's happening folks! Scalar Waves exist! In nature: scalar waves travel beneath the ocean's surface and eventually become Tsunami's which cause vast destruction when the wave arrives at a land mass. A small boat sitting atop a passing Tsunami (let's say some thousand miles from shore) will not even notice the wave passing... there is not up/down (vertical) or 'herzian' movement, but believe me, when that ocean scalar wave arrrives on land.... they DO GET NOTICED! You must be at the arrival point to be able to observe a scalar wave. It's travel time in EM is essentially instantaneous. | |
| RMCybernetics | Tuesday, 6th March 2007 11:53am - No.851 |
| Scalar EM is not a new idea. I'm well aware of his work and the fact that he and his collegues retracted many of the claims after they were exposed to public scrutiny. I know of no verifiable evidence of this experment. You said "...he is able to generate powerful scalar waves..., which have punched holes in the sides of building 3 miles away!" How is this a scalar wave, if it makes a hole? By their definition, a scalar wave has the same value at all points in space. I can't say scalar waves don't exist, simply because I can't prove a negative (you can't always prove something does not exist), but I don't know of any evidence for scalar electromagnetic waves that can be or has been verified by the wider scientific community. I'm open to any new ideas and theory, but without some kind of evidence, I will not state them as a fact. I don't believe in supressing information, and that is why this page is here, but I must write it in a way that allows people to make their own judgement. If you have evidence to the contrary then feel free to post it here. If you have written a document that you would like people to look at you could email it to us and we could put it in the Other Theory section of the site. | |
| RMCybernetics | Thursday, 8th March 2007 2:24pm - No.855 |
| Just an update. I spotted an article describing a similar sounding antigravity experiment. It uses a superconducting ring, but it as been described as almost the opposite to Podkletnov's experiment. See the video interview on google here. | |
| tanner921 | Sunday, 1st April 2007 7:25am - No.1028 |
| I wish my name was Dr Holland, then I could be smart and know what I'm talking about. hey did you guys know that the moon doesnt exist? trust me, it really doesnt exist, I read it on the internet. they said they have proof of it, and I am gullible and stupid enough to believe it... ...scalar waves have NOTHING to do with the ocean or the waves in the ocean!! what do you mean by the scalar waves are felt on the land? if it's a tsunami 'scalar wave,' and it's felt on the land... it's not a tsunami!! and also if it's felt on land, it's PROBABLY a seismic wave, and those aren't scalar! they're either transverse or longitudinal! I'm not biased against podkletnov's claims, but unless there is hard proof, proving that it's true, ya just cant really believe it, especially when it's such a far fetched idea. DON'T believe everything you read/hear from friends and on the net without using logic, people! | |
| tanner921 | Sunday, 1st April 2007 7:41am - No.1029 |
| I doubt the superconductor ring/weight change has anything to do with gravity. superconductors are perfect diamagnets, and generate an opposing magnetic field to the induced field, thus repelling the magnetic field/object inducing the field. when a diamagnetic metal (i imagine all metals have diamagnetic properties-some more than others) enters a magnetic field, there is a repelling force on the diamagnet, and magnet. imagine all materials-metallic or nonmetallic- induce a magnetic field (because all atoms have moving electrons, so according to faraday's law, there is a magnetic field induced by the electron's movement). so if all materials have a magnetic field,-though they may be very very weak- perhaps there is a dielectric 'reaction' between the superconductor and material, which is perhaps amplified by the spinning of the superconductor. I assume the spinning amplifies the reaction because when inducing a magnetic field, in order for the field to continue inducing a current, the field (apparently) must change. take the first DC generator for example: it used a dielectric disk, moving through a magnetic field, which induced a current 90* to the field-but the disk has to keep on moving for the current to be induced. also look at transformers- same thing, the current has to switch direction in order... SO i wonder if podkletnov has experimented with various metallic and nonmetallic materials! | |
| Kilijawa | Wednesday, 15th August 2007 5:42am - No.1591 |
| About the induce magneto-gravitic field, here is an experiment done by the ESA. http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html According to them the phenomenon is predicted by general relativity but is negligible. | |
| andrew | Sunday, 9th September 2007 2:51pm - No.1696 |
| if virtual particles pop out of a field to pass on forces (energy) from one real particle to another real particle, how many do you get to the meter? Do you get a different sort of virtual particle to exchange forces between the virtual particles? Do virtual particles have their own virtual fields of virtual particles? Scalar spherical oscilations within a single elastic medium (aether) has to be more sensible than virtual particles popping into existance from somewhere else(unknown dimensions)!See WSM.. | |
| Your name here | Monday, 10th September 2007 1:50pm - No.1699 |
| tanner921, A superconductor is not a diamagnet. If you have a magnet levitating over a superconductor it looks like diamagnetism. If you then turn the apparatus upside down, the magnets juxtaposition will remain the same (i.e. it will be suspended under the superconductor in the same position) andrew, The virtual particles don't offer much interaction with matter in any measurable way. At the event horizon of a black hole it is possible for one of the virtual particles from a pair to be sucked in while the other remains stranded outside the black hole where it is free to interact with normal matter. Radiation given off in this process in known as Hawking Radiation. | |
| Koen | Thursday, 20th September 2007 9:09pm - No.1743 |
| Indeed, a scalar is not a vector, and therefore a "scalar" electromagnetic wave is nonsense. But the science of electrodynamics can be generalised such that it allows for an extra scalar field and scalar field effects, see http://home.wanadoo.nl/raccoon It is simply defined as S = - k dV/dt - div(A), where k is a constant, V is electric potential and A is the magnetic potential, div(A) is the divergence of the magnetic potential, and dV/dt is the time differential of the electric potential. I was able to describe longitudinal electro-scalar waves (which a vector AND a scalar wave at the same time). Nikola Tesla and several others claimed to have generated and measured longitudinal electric waves. I described this mathematically. I discovered that there is a new type of electric power conversion associated with static charge and this type of scalar field. I also discovered the field theory of the longitudinal Ampere force, in terms of the scalar field defined by me. My theory is not pseudo science, it is testable, and describes unusual effects that have been shown during independent experiments by several scientists. | |
| OAK OMKR | Monday, 6th October 2008 4:54pm - No.3162 |
| HOW DID COLONEL DR TOM BEARDEN BUILD AN SCALAR RADAR? IS THE CURRENT ODD WEATHER PATTERNS A PART OF SCALAR WAR? | |
| Fred | Monday, 6th October 2008 9:31pm - No.3164 |
| Modern technology, tesla technology RADAR, Computers, Green Technology, various healing and feedback devices. Are dangrous. They don`t comply to basic BSI, EMC law.. (Main stream science just says the universe creates more power than these deivces, yes it might, if it was measured though conventional meters.) I am told the various industries like air con systems. Know full well the systems are over powered. Poor understanding by the people installing has left us being exposed to huge levels of radiation. The industires take no part in making sure tesla or scalar technology complise to standards. They even sell the product with a faulty lableing saying it comlplies to EU/EMC regs. The system are massivey over powered. The systems are misold as low level radiation.. When its called a particle accelorator it works in combination with radioactive metals to either speed up or slow down the radiation. Both the particle and the metal create ionizing radition. Something the NRPB (HPA) wish to not know about. Industry be that aircraft, wind turbines is selling technology under false protences. Its the company who buy them, and the companies they employ to install them who re then resonsible. The manufacture has the excuss that the product is too large to test in-house: The staff instilling them don`t know there is a change in polarity. To conventional power systems threby taking the energy off scale into non-hertzian power... These devices are linked to biofeed back and mind control devices.. We have all been sucked in. After all its a weapon: | |
| omkr oak | Thursday, 30th October 2008 7:52pm - No.3254 |
| Type your message here did DR TESLA DEVELOP THE SARSHAYGAN HOWITZER | |
© 2006. All Rights Reserved.