Electrohydrodynamic Thrusters (aka Lifters)
Courtesy of Blaze Labs Research
EHD stands for Electro Hydro Dynamics which is the study of the flow of a fluid under the effect of an electric field. The principle of ionic air propulsion with corona generated charged particles has been known as from the earliest days of the discovery of electricity. One of the first reference to sensing moving air near a charged tube appeared in year 1709 in a book titled 'Physico-Mechanical Experiments on Various Subjects' by F.Hauksbee. Many other pioneers of electricity, including Newton, Faraday, and Maxwell, studied this phenomenon. Unfortunately, EHD is not a common topic in most high school syllabus, which is the main reason why most of the general public get confused when seeing such devices in action.

An EHD thruster is an electrohydrodynamic device which ionises air and moves the charged ion cloud in a way and direction to transfer momentum to neutral air molecules. By Newton's third law of motion, action is equal and opposite to reaction, and the EHD thruster will move in the opposite direction of the ion cloud. Ionocrafts was the name given to the first kind of vertical takeoff EHD thrusters designed during the early 60's, and form part of the EHD thrusters family. Recently, this effect has gained popularity under the less appropriately titled 'lifter' which due to the lack of knowledge of EHD by most people, has been related to some sort of antigravity effect. It is a well known fact that these devices produce thrust along their own axis, and not against the force of gravity as would be expected from an antigravity device. An EHD thruster in its simplest form is made up of two electrodes, one with a sharp edge, the ioniser and one with a smooth edge, the collector, which when powered by a high dc voltage (a few kV ) produces thrust against the surrounding medium, normally air.
For construction details, see the DIY Devices section.

The diagram below shows a EHDT in its most basic form. It consists of a fine wire, suspended above a sheet of aliminium foil, by a lightweight insulating support such as balsa wood. If a high voltage DC source is connected as shown, a thrust will be produced, propelling the device in the direction of the positive wire. This thrust is due the motion of air, or any other dieletric (insulating) fluid around the device, as described below.
The top sharp electrode ionises the air. If the electrode is positive, free electrons in the vicinity will accelerate towards it, and strip off other electrons from the air molecules around the sharp wire.
A cloud of heavy positive charges is thus formed, and the avalanche of electrons approaching the sharp electrode account for the corona & ionisation current. In their mad rush from the ion emitter to the smooth negative electrode, the positive ions bump into neutral air molecules-air particles without electric charge. The force exerted on them by the electric field is offset by the force of friction caused by collisions of the ions with the neutral air molecules. As a result, ions drift through the air gap with an approximately constant velocity Vd, that is proportional to the electric field given by Vd=kE, where the proportionality constant K is called the ion mobility, the highest the value the more mobile (faster) and the less friction is offered.
The terrific wallop in these collisions hurls a mass of neutral air downward along with the ions. The distance in cm travelled by an ionised air molecule until it hits a neutral air molecule is given by the mean free path and is equal to 5E-3/P, where P=760 Torr at sea level. The larger the air gap relative to the mean free path, which works out to be equal to 6.6E-6cm, the more probability there is of an ion repeatedly hitting neutral molecules, and therefore the more impacts and thus effective thrust we get. During these collisions, the ion charge is not transferred to the neutrals. When they reach the lower smooth electrode, the ions, still being positive, hit it and neutralise themselves. But the grid has no attraction for the neutral air particles that got bumped along. So the air flows right along the sides of the lower electrode, making a downdraft of neutral air beneath the EHD device. The fact that most ions are neutralised at the collector explains why the reading we get from ion measuring meters setup below such devices does not account for the measured thrust. In fact for a good EHD thruster, such a reading should be close to zero. If however, one accurately measures the force exerted by the air exiting the collector side over a flat surface, it is found that this force is equal and opposite to the thrust of the device.
An EHD thruster works without moving parts, flies silently, uses only electrical energy and when immersed in a fluid (air, oil, etc..) is able to lift its own weight together with additional payload. The basic design of the simple lifter has been fully described in the TT Brown US Patent N°2949550 filed in 1957 and titled "Elektrokinetic Apparatus". Even though T.T.Brown was fully aware that the thrust from his devices was due to ion interactions, lack of EHD knowledge at that time, resulted in very low efficiency operation of these first EHD thrusters. Shown below is one of Brown & Bahnson's designs described in US Patent #3,223,038, and an ultra simple EHDT made from aliminium foil, balsa wood and a fine copper wire.
While extensive research was performed in the 1950's and 1960's on the use of electric propulsion for interplanetary spaceflight, many promising concepts had to be abandoned due to the technological limitations of the power conditioning systems in use at the time. It is also understood that the research & development of ionic thrusters by NASA at those days was aimed mainly for interplanetary space flights, and the fact that ionocrafts need a fluid medium to work has led these fantastic devices to be largely abandoned by the scientific community since the late 1960's.

To date no consistent effort has been made to reevaluate these approaches in light of modern power processing technologies and develop flying machines to operate within the atmosphere. During the 1960's a lot of work on EHD technology had been accomplished by Major De Seversky (pictured below). De Seversky noticed an air flow developing between the two electrodes of an air ioniser commonly used to clean air. "To an old flyer like me," said the major, "anything that stirs up a wind is a flying machine. So I began to develop the idea." In fact a few years later, he patented The Ionocraft patent no:US3130945 in April 28, 1964. The major seemed concerned that the Ionocraft might be mistaken for a kind of space vehicle. "This is not a spacecraft," he explained emphatically to forestall any possible misunderstanding. "It's an airplane, designed to operate within the atmosphere. But it will be able to do things that no present type of aircraft can accomplish." Indeed, this misunderstanding still prevails in the present days, but Blaze Labs research clearly shows that EHD thrusters & lifters do not work in vacuum.
End of Blaze Labs Article
Note that the Bifield Brown Effect is an effect aparently produced by capacitors or electrodes that are asymmetrical (of different sizes). This is what causes the mojority of confusion around the "Lifter" devices. You can see from the images that one electrode is sigificantly larger then the other. Most Lifters or EHD thrusters are powered with voltages below 30kV. It is said that the Bifield Brown effect would become more apparent at more extreme voltages such as above the 50kV mark. The vacuum tests performed by Blaze Labs were performed with a Lifter powered at 30kV. NASA have also perfomed vacuum tests on a rotational lifter setup powered at 50kV. These tests are not 100% conclusive but it seems unlikley that a device based on the design of a Lifter will have any significant implications for propulsion technology.
For construction details, see the DIY Devices section.



The information provided here can not be guaranteed as accurate or correct. Always check with an alternate source before following any suggestions made here.
What's the minimum DC voltage & current required to operate it?
The minimum voltage needed to produce thrust is dependent upon the distance between the two electrodes. The voltage commonly used in DIY lifter experiments is usually between 10kV and 30kV at around 1mA
The main disadvantages of EHD thrusters aren't really part of the thruster design, but simply the fact that currently chemical fuels have a higher energy density than any electrical power storage devices. Such a craft would require either batteries or a generator. The former would have to be quite massive (compare to an electric car) and the latter would nullify any advantages of the engine design (ie portable generators are inefficient and require their own fuel source).
I am not worried about lift as much as I am thrust. I am trying to find a way to make a light experimental aircraft have a longer range.
Haplo (above) mentions that the power-thrust efficiency is about 1%, so you may only get 660W worth of thrust.
I'm not sure if anyone has tested an EHD in an exhaust jet, but I expect it would work quite differently. You can see in these pictures of plasma that a hot jet has a noticable effect on a HV discharge.
Maybe using the EHD on the wings (if it has any) or chassis to reduce drag or control airflow around the craft would be a more efficient way.
http://www.americanantigravity.com/video/Lifter4-D1a.MPG
Personally, I think he mispronounced the word. If that lifter can hover at 30 uA, then a car battery should send it through the roof.
I will see to this and make sure if it is possible. I'm testing what this guy said!
The guy Tim Venturas says the lifter's "consuming" 30 uA. I apologize for the mix-up.
I also would like to know what store/place sells them.
I've finally built the bloody thing and just need the generator. I am still going to try the car battery idea, tonight hopefully. Would a car battery with 600 amps power the ionocraft up?
Just connecting a car battery will not move a lifter unfortunatley. You are correct in thinking that 600A would be good. The thrust of a lifter is proportional to the current, but they need at least 1kV (1000V) to work. This is because the high voltage causes the air to become ionized and mobile. Without enough voltage to ionize ha air, nothing much will happen.
Has anybody heard of the Searl effect?
Im just going on the fact that at higher voltages the particles are accelerated to a much higher velocity.
http://www.festo.com/INetDomino/coorp_sites/en/df10fdeeb58db201c12571b9002ba9c4.htm
just one stupid question; can i accelerate the positive particles further with a magnetic field instead of an electric one? I'm so lost with this stuff :-)
Oh and one more! Does the device preform the same way no matter the polarity, or does it have to have + in the "front"?
If the magnetic field is in the same direction as the direction of travel of the ion, no deflection (or acceleration) will occur.
I recommend you read out introduction to electromagnetism to get a better understanding of some of the underlying principles.
Apparently they will work with either polarity although I think it is better if the wire is +ve.
If an ion encounters a magnetic field, will it move in a circular path? Will positive ions circle in on direction, and negative ions in the opposite direction?
Is it possible to contain a cushion of ionized air with a magnetic field?
Could this be used for a new kind of hovercraft which uses a 'magnetic skirt' to trap ionized air?
I have a feeling that the ions might spiral away from the magnetic field and the hovercraft would not work.
Would a toroidal coil be effective at containing ionized air?
Magnetic fields are often used to confine plasmas in various systems. A penning trap forms a pair of 'magnetic mirors' to trap a non-neutral plasma. A tokamak is a toroidal system used ofr containing plasma for nuclear fusion research.
You could make some sort of air cusion i gues sin theory, but it would require huge amounts of power to maintain any lift like you describe, thus making it impractical.
Or is the lift effect due more to displacement? The bigger the better?
This is a field with fascinating possibilities.
It forms ozone but I couldn't comment on the effect on fuel efficiency.
The circuit to do as you require is just a common bridge rectifier. This can be made from four high voltage diodes. I suspect placing it a tube would increase drag but if the thruster its self was designed in such a way this could help with efficiency.
Kevin Sullivan,
The video clip on the DIY EHDT page shows a tiny lifter of just a few cm. Even tinier ones should work well too but at some point there will be a limit of size vs having sufficient electrode spacing for the high voltage needed for ionization.
Ozone conversion energy included in that.
"The truth is out there" but it's not like the X files version. Stay informed folks!
I have read one of the books you mentioned to me. I think it is interesting that the authors of such books are happy to explain how this amazing technology works yet I have not seen any evidence of it. Not even a simple benchtop demonstration (Except the hutchinson effect(s) which is very interesting but has not yet been replicated publicly to my knowledge).
It is most likely that there are experimental aircraft being flown in our skies and the use of UFO/Alien stories makes a great cover for them. These things are secret for a reason. You should not be trying to publicly expose whatever research is going on.
As for the wormholes and visiting anywhere in the universe... come one now, that is just speculative fantasy.
Interesting reading through the information provided. Can anyone tell me what is the maximum payload in kg's that one of these can lift ? Also, does the use of a fluid medium increase effiency (such as oil?)
Also why does it have to be very tiny? is it because of the high voltage generated? If I use a larger Van De Graff can I build a heavier lifter? Thanks